Price drops in and around Roermond
More homes in and around Roermond whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14/07/2026 | Aan de Mismeer 12 Herkenbosch | € 635.000 € 619.000 | -2.5% | 182 m²742 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Notenboomlaan 18 Roermond | € 285.000 € 279.500 | -1.9% | 80 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Grindbank 13 Swalmen | € 409.000 € 399.000 | -2.4% | 137 m²210 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Schoolstraat 2 A Roermond | € 295.000 € 289.000 | -2.0% | 76 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Jan Pieterszoon Coenstraat 34 Roermond | € 275.000 € 259.000 | -5.8% | 91 m²155 m² | |||
08/07/2026 | Heilige Geeststraat 14 Roermond | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 272 m²114 m² | |||
08/07/2026 | De Kolk 62 Swalmen | € 385.000 € 375.000 | -2.6% | 125 m²141 m² | |||
07/07/2026 | Dorpsstraat 90 D Roermond | € 349.000 € 325.000 | -6.9% | 118 m² | |||
07/07/2026 | Swalmerstraat 50 A Roermond | € 569.000 € 529.000 | -7.0% | 146 m² | |||
07/07/2026 | Swalmerstraat 50 Roermond | € 529.000 € 485.000 | -8.3% | 134 m² | |||
07/07/2026 | Schuitenberg 12 H Roermond | € 299.500 € 269.000 | -10.2% | 84 m² | |||
03/07/2026 | Grotestraat 5 Linne | € 498.000 € 469.000 | -5.8% | 186 m²265 m² | |||
03/07/2026 | Beltmolenstraat 35 Roggel | € 585.000 € 525.000 | -10.3% | 198 m²433 m² | |||
03/07/2026 | Marktstraat 5 Echt | € 750.000 € 700.000 | -6.7% | 276 m²1495 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | Burgemeester Joostenlaan 11 Roermond | € 445.000 € 429.000 | -3.6% | 126 m²272 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | Napoleonsweg 128 m Neer | € 419.000 € 394.000 | -6.0% | 116 m² | |||
02/07/2026 | Elmpterbaan 5 Swalmen | € 329.000 € 290.000 | -11.8% | 109 m²210 m² | |||
01/07/2026 | Wernerstraat 13 Swalmen | € 474.500 € 449.500 | -5.3% | 102 m²350 m² | |||
24/06/2026 | Pierre Cuypersstraat 10 Roermond | € 395.000 € 379.500 | -3.9% | 106 m² | |||
24/06/2026 | Appartement 12 Roermond | € 359.000 € 344.900 | -3.9% | 85 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Achter de Steenen Trappen 33
Apartment at Achter de Steenen Trappen 33 in Roermond (Binnenstad neighbourhood). The home was built in 2010 and has 109 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Roermond (562 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Steenen Brug (480 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer16 Jul 2026
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 325,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 109 m²
- Construction year
- 2010
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 364,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Binnenstad, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby6
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside35.9%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors42.1%
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions15 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)81 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical750 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values13.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.639 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away86.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits within 500 m · 9 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 209 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
49th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
49th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
57th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 273 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 228 pupils
Disadvantage score 78 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
71st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
73rd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 283 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 72 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
82nd percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 134 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 265 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 269 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
32nd percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.