Price drops in and around Roermond
More homes in and around Roermond whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jan Pieterszoon Coenstraat 34
Terraced house at Jan Pieterszoon Coenstraat 34 in Roermond (De Kemp neighbourhood). The home was built in 1959 and has 117 m² of living space, a 155 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Roermond (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool t Mozaiek (437 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced9 Jul 2026€ 259,000−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale6 Jun 2026€ 275,000
Property details
- Living area
- 117 m²
- Plot
- 155 m²
- Construction year
- 1959
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 219,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in De Kemp, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.5%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside42%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby6
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential arearesidential area
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot93 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space62 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)188 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,435 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,020 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13.8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 13 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
60th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 227 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
57th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 228 pupils
Disadvantage score 78 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
49th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
43rd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
49th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 273 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 209 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 287 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 269 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
10th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 72 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
82nd percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 134 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 265 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.