Price drops in and around Groningen
More homes in and around Groningen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Goudenregenstraat 21
Semi-detached at Goudenregenstraat 21 in Groningen (Bloemenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1932 and has 67 m² of living space, a 60 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Groningen Noord (1.9 km). The nearest primary school is IKC Borgman Oosterpark (139 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced12 Jun 2026€ 300,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 67 m²
- Plot
- 60 m²
- Construction year
- 1932
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 277,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bloemenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Soil standard exceeded
- Standard exceededYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance11.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35.2%
- Share of social assistance recipients
- High10.8%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes71.6%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental66%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels43%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space57 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical690 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,793 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Good yield957 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
17 permits within 500 m · 4 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 338 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 66 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
49th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 355 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 13% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 443 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
86th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 304 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 23% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 209 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 237 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
81st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 279 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 413 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 19% of schools
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 59 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 84% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
44th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 125 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/PRO
19th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 65 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 27 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.