Price drops in and around Groningen
More homes in and around Groningen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Petrus Driessenstraat 14
Apartment at Petrus Driessenstraat 14 in Groningen (Professorenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1929 and has 70 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Groningen Noord (738 m). The nearest primary school is De Kleine Wereld (421 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer20 Jul 2026
- Relisted3 Jul 2026€ 300,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 315,000
Property details
- Living area
- 70 m²
- Construction year
- 1929
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 167,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Professorenbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable16%
- Soil standard exceeded
- Standard exceededYes
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34.8%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes71.1%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)146 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical720 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.455 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away29.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
36 permits within 500 m · 4 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
no recent test score · total 66 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
86th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 304 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 23% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 443 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 209 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 338 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
60th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 63 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 413 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 19% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 288 pupils
Disadvantage score 121 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
76th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 240 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
27th percentile — average · 84% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
24th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 258 exam candidates
44th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 125 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 59 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
39th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 244 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.