Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hoefakkerstraat 79
Terraced house at Hoefakkerstraat 79 in Tilburg (Besterd neighbourhood). The home was built in 1905 and has 127 m² of living space, a 163 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Tilburg (773 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Den Bijstere (277 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted3 Jul 2026€ 529,000−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 545,000
Property details
- Living area
- 127 m²
- Plot
- 163 m²
- Construction year
- 1905
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 390,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Besterd, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable10%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)385 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby20
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby12
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,963.7 mol/ha/yr
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space85 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,892 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.766 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away37.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
90th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 572 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 94 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 281 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile — high · AMN · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
72nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 326 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 592 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
41st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
62nd percentile — average · AMN · grade 8: 96 pupils · total 606 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 41% of schools
13th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
89th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
17th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
46th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 288 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.