Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Bart van Peltplein 21
Apartment at Bart van Peltplein 21 in Tilburg (Sint Pieterspark neighbourhood). The home was built in 1971 and has 49 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Tilburg (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is De Cocon (622 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced15 Jul 2026€ 235,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale26 Jun 2026€ 250,000
Property details
- Living area
- 49 m²
- Construction year
- 1971
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 253,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Sint Pieterspark, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby14
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated100 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1148 score
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High17.1%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot7,380 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average33%
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical720 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.757 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away36 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)22.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)2.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 16 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
41st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
90th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 572 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 281 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 416 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
65th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 68 pupils · total 373 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
16th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 88 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
17th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
46th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
89th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.