Price drops in and around Arnhem
More homes in and around Arnhem whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24/07/2026 | Javastraat 21 Arnhem | € 280.000 € 250.000 | -10.7% | 69 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Bakenbergseweg 250 Arnhem | € 1.995.000 € 1.850.000 | -7.3% | 350 m²5750 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Kwekerijstraat garage J-23 Arnhem | € 41.000 € 39.000 | -4.9% | — | |||
22/07/2026 | Zutphensestraatweg 57 Velp (GE) | € 650.000 € 629.500 | -3.1% | 126 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kersenbongerd 7 Huissen | € 445.000 € 425.000 | -4.5% | 135 m²157 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Bauerstraat 31 4 Arnhem | € 345.000 € 319.500 | -7.4% | 91 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Roermondsplein 38 1 Arnhem | € 435.000 € 385.000 | -11.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Utrechtsestraat 33 3 Arnhem | € 285.000 € 265.000 | -7.0% | 79 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Meander 85 Bemmel | € 499.500 € 487.500 | -2.4% | 125 m²140 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hofsingel 23 B Arnhem | € 32.500 € 27.500 | -15.4% | — | |||
16/07/2026 | Jane Addamsstraat 13 Arnhem | € 539.000 € 525.000 | -2.6% | 135 m²215 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Bothaweg 9 Oosterbeek | € 729.000 € 652.000 | -10.6% | 156 m²605 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Walstraat 4 8 Arnhem | € 550.000 € 495.000 | -10.0% | 142 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Den Heuvel 126 Velp (GE) | € 275.000 € 260.000 | -5.5% | 79 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Witsenstraat 12 3 Arnhem | € 485.000 € 450.000 | -7.2% | 133 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Prümelaan 34 Arnhem | € 1.095.000 € 1.050.000 | -4.1% | 197 m²316 m² | 0 1 0 | ||
13/07/2026 | De Wiltstraat 43 Arnhem | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 43 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Dominicanenweg 47 Arnhem | € 639.500 € 619.500 | -3.1% | 135 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Bouriciusstraat 8 Arnhem | € 1.050.000 € 998.000 | -5.0% | 232 m²172 m² | |||
09/07/2026 | Klaverlaan 16 Arnhem | € 249.500 € 239.500 | -4.0% | 53 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Javastraat 21
Apartment at Javastraat 21 in Arnhem (Klarendal-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1977 and has 69 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Arnhem Velperpoort (504 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Kunst Rijk (227 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 250,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 280,000
Property details
- Living area
- 69 m²
- Construction year
- 1977
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 255,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Klarendal-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Share of social assistance recipientsⓘ
- High9.9%
- Share of households lowest 40% incomeⓘ
- strong concentration of low incomes68.3%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High18.3%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated190 persons
- Liveability classⓘ
- Weakweak
- Liveability scoreⓘ
- clearly below average-0.1698 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.189 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- high share21.1%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High17.5%
- Smokers (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Many smokers31.8%
- High stress (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much stress27.5%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhoodⓘ
- Predominantly social rental64%
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)ⓘ
- Low (bottom quarter)22%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)77.5%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)72.5%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure12
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance10.3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High3.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.6%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside30.5%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors34.2%
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels7%
- Number of soil surveysⓘ
- Soil survey registered4
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Heavy train noise3.9%
- Serious noise nuisance from wind turbines (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much turbine nuisance1.6%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated10.1 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- Elevated1.3%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot662 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical720 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11.7%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.628 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away5.6 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)17.9 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)2.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
22nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 59: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
60th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
40th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 121: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
83rd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 280 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 43% of schools
38th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 53% of schools
22nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 158 pupils
Disadvantage score 45: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
80th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
57th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 372 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
95th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 472 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile: average · 99% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 83 exam candidates
44th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 228 exam candidates
33rd percentile: average · 84% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · PRO
41st percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 217 exam candidates
81st percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 91 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
57th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 26 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.