Price drops in and around Hillegom
More homes in and around Hillegom whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25/07/2026 | Kampervest 49 Haarlem | β¬ 745.000 β¬ 650.000 | -12.8% | 137 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Heldringstraat 2 Haarlem | β¬ 550.000 β¬ 535.000 | -2.7% | 118 mΒ²144 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Vosselaan 67 Hillegom | β¬ 669.000 β¬ 649.000 | -3.0% | 129 mΒ²70 mΒ² | |||
23/07/2026 | Rembrandtweg 1 Noordwijk (ZH) | β¬ 3.600.000 β¬ 3.250.000 | -9.7% | 159 mΒ²385 mΒ² | |||
23/07/2026 | Aalburgplein 31 Hoofddorp | β¬ 445.000 β¬ 425.000 | -4.5% | 79 mΒ² | |||
22/07/2026 | Dorpstraat 2 Nieuw-Vennep | β¬ 525.000 β¬ 495.000 | -5.7% | 134 mΒ²152 mΒ² | |||
22/07/2026 | ProvinciΓ«nlaan 3 B33 Heemstede | β¬ 399.000 β¬ 375.000 | -6.0% | 100 mΒ² | |||
22/07/2026 | Industrieweg 13 Heemstede | β¬ 495.000 β¬ 425.000 | -14.1% | 115 mΒ² | |||
22/07/2026 | Writsaert 138 Noordwijk (ZH) | β¬ 499.500 β¬ 459.500 | -8.0% | 69 mΒ² | |||
21/07/2026 | Savelsbos 47 Hoofddorp | β¬ 550.000 β¬ 525.000 | -4.5% | 113 mΒ²242 mΒ² | |||
21/07/2026 | De Mook 41 Noordwijk (ZH) | β¬ 939.000 β¬ 899.500 | -4.2% | 156 mΒ²137 mΒ² | |||
20/07/2026 | Verlaat 26 Leimuiden | β¬ 725.000 β¬ 699.000 | -3.6% | 187 mΒ² | |||
20/07/2026 | Bonnikeplein 105 Noordwijk (ZH) | β¬ 510.000 β¬ 489.000 | -4.1% | 77 mΒ² | |||
20/07/2026 | Duizendblad 44 Noordwijk (ZH) | β¬ 598.000 β¬ 569.500 | -4.8% | 128 mΒ²169 mΒ² | |||
20/07/2026 | Golfbaan 47 Noordwijk (ZH) | β¬ 459.500 β¬ 439.500 | -4.3% | 69 mΒ² | |||
17/07/2026 | Spoorzichtlaan 1 Heemstede | β¬ 890.000 β¬ 865.000 | -2.8% | 147 mΒ²210 mΒ² | |||
16/07/2026 | de Ruyterstraat 37 Noordwijk (ZH) | β¬ 549.000 β¬ 535.000 | -2.5% | 118 mΒ²145 mΒ² | |||
16/07/2026 | Reinout 11 Noordwijk (ZH) | β¬ 519.500 β¬ 499.500 | -3.9% | 77 mΒ² | |||
16/07/2026 | Karel Doormanstraat 4 F6 Zandvoort | β¬ 439.000 β¬ 429.000 | -2.3% | 86 mΒ² | |||
16/07/2026 | de Ruyterstraat 6 F3 Zandvoort | β¬ 470.000 β¬ 450.000 | -4.3% | 80 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Leeghwater 82
Semi-detached at Leeghwater 82 in Hillegom (Vossepolder neighbourhood). The home was built in 2009 and has 153 mΒ² of living space, a 126 mΒ² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Hillegom (2.2 km). The nearest primary school is IKC Vossepark (270 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted26 Jul 2026β¬ 725,000ββ¬ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026β¬ 750,000
Property details
- Living area
- 153 mΒ²
- Plot
- 126 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 2009
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- β¬ 691,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Vossepolder, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyβ
- Low share renewable22%
- Distance to charging pointβ
- No charging point in the neighbourhood2.2 km
- Distance to interchange stationβ
- Far away12.1 km
- General practitioners within 1 kmβ
- No GP within 1 km0
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress45 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Number of risk sources within 1 kmβ
- Many sources8
- Asbestos-suspected roof areaβ
- Large suspected asbestos roof area45.6 mΒ²
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)β
- Very high groundwater17 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)β
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Average WOZ value (municipality)β
- Above national average⬠500,000
- Number of soil surveysβ
- Soil survey registered1
- Distance to tree nurseryβ
- Nearby (50-250 m)205 m
- Distance to airportβ
- Nearby11.6 km
- Distance to tram/metro lineβ
- Far away13.8 km
- Within Wbb soil locationβ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)β
- Elevated4.3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)β
- Elevated1.9%
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmβ
- Multiple sources3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)β
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotβ
- Own plotNo
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerβ
- Many solar panels59%
- Calculated COβ emissionsβ
- Low emissions20 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsβ
- Ample roof space141 mΒ²
- Energy index (primary fossil)β
- Efficient (label A/B)112 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy labelβ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionβ
- Economical260 mΒ³
- Solar potential roofβ
- Very high potential10,288 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m Β· 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
37th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 12 pupils Β· total 258 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 28% of schools
9th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 19 pupils Β· total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 30% of schools
39th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 17 pupils Β· total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
44th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 48 pupils Β· total 412 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 23 pupils Β· total 193 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
18th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 46 pupils Β· total 392 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 54 pupils Β· total 452 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 26 pupils Β· total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
70th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 24 pupils Β· total 176 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 25 pupils Β· total 202 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
57th percentile: average Β· 95% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 188 exam candidates
51st percentile: average Β· 92% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 184 exam candidates
33rd percentile: average Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 157 exam candidates
30th percentile: average Β· 93% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 214 exam candidates
11th percentile: low Β· 85% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 185 exam candidates
57th percentile: average Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 277 exam candidates
17th percentile: low Β· 88% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 287 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.