Price drops in and around Haarlem
More homes in and around Haarlem whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Heldringstraat 2
Semi-detached at Heldringstraat 2 in Haarlem (Archimedesbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 130 m² of living space, a 144 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Haarlem Spaarnwoude (3.1 km). The nearest primary school is De Molenwiek Montessori (267 m).
Price & status history
- For sale24 Jul 2026
- Price reduced24 Jul 2026€ 535,000−€ 15,000
- Sold (conditional)18 Jun 2026
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 130 m²
- Plot
- 144 m²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 519,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Archimedesbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High18.9%
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2542 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1661 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share26.1%
- Net labour participation
- Low59%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High19.1%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental73%
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)11%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)71.7%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure9
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.9%
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater17 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 548,000
- Distance to airport
- Nearby8.9 km
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away7.8 km
- Estimated sun hours (winter)
- Virtually no winter sun0.5 hour
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.9%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.3 °C
- Masts within 300 m
- Multiple transmission masts4
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot83 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space78 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,582 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,029 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.724 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 8 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
11th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 14: more disadvantage than 50% of schools
68th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 39: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
39th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 69: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
16th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 243 pupils
Disadvantage score 29: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
3rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
15th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 365 pupils
Disadvantage score 104: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
8th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 76: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
14th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
37th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
29th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
35th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 152 exam candidates
83rd percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO
no exam results · HAVO
56th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 167 exam candidates
94th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 203 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
13th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 77 exam candidates
27th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
24th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 212 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.