Price drops in and around Enschede
More homes in and around Enschede whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Beltstraat 82
Apartment at Beltstraat 82 in Enschede (Getfert neighbourhood). The home was built in 1963 and has 88 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Enschede (785 m). The nearest primary school is Nederlandsche Islamitische Basisschool Al Ummah (368 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced29 Jul 2026€ 359,000−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale9 Jul 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 88 m²
- Construction year
- 1963
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 247,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Getfert, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime104.1 per 1,000 residents
- Buildings under construction in the neighbourhood
- intensive building activity55 buildings
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.3%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.3%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure10
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- High5.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.6%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High3.7%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.4%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Building coverage percentage
- Almost completely built up100%
- Unbuilt plot area
- Almost completely built up0 m²
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- One within 1 km1
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Nearby (within area of influence)976 m
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work43.3%· NL 27%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- above-average many low incomes60.5%
- Share of persons in poverty
- Above average7.2%
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Building activity in the neighbourhood16
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical690 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.3%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.615 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away7.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)39.2 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)14.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 16 construction plans within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
54th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 333 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
68th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 107 pupils · total 718 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 14% of schools
5th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 92 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
74th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 534 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
58th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 348 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
40th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 49: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
96th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 192 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 144 pupils
Disadvantage score 63: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 459 pupils
Disadvantage score 29: more disadvantage than 70% of schools
50th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 162 exam candidates
18th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
8th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 152 exam candidates
10th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 314 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.