Price drops in and around Amstelveen
More homes in and around Amstelveen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Groenhof 378
Apartment at Groenhof 378 in Amstelveen (Kringloopbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1973 and has 63 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Amsteltrein (5.1 km). The nearest primary school is Reformatorische Basisschool De Akker (298 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced29 Jun 2026€ 339,900−€ 10,100
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 63 m²
- Construction year
- 1973
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 327,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kringloopbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Well above national average€ 615,000
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.8%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.1 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.4
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated270 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.3%
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate€ 12
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.9%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.1%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot712 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.3%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.627 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away13.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)13 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)2.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 6 construction plans within 500 m · 17 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
66th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 83 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 187 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 213 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 12% of schools
93rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 395 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
93rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 205 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
47th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
25th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 298 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
57th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 120 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 45 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 19 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.