Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Middenweg 402
Apartment at Middenweg 402 in Amsterdam (Betondorp neighbourhood). The home was built in 1925 and has 89 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Science Park (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool De Octopus (778 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted17 Jul 2026€ 625,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 675,000
Property details
- Living area
- 89 m²
- Construction year
- 1925
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 657,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Betondorp, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.4%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive56 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside42.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36.5%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental77%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot6,360 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical690 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.555 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away12.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)9.5 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)6.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 38 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
19th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 373 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
28th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 533 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 77 pupils · total 451 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
80th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 434 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 353 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
17th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 101 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
83rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/PRO · 20 exam candidates
90th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.8 · MAVO · 58 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 72% passed · CE avg 5.9 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 158 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 105 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 102 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.