Price drops in and around Roermond
More homes in and around Roermond whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hattem 104
Apartment at Hattem 104 in Roermond (Roer-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1985 and has 89 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Roermond (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Steenen Brug (770 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted28 Jul 2026€ 300,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 315,000
Property details
- Living area
- 89 m²
- Construction year
- 1985
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 284,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Roer-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot254 m above sea level
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.04 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Distance to groundwater protection area
- In protected area (stricter rules)0 m
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.2%
- In groundwater protection area
- In protected areaYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Type of protection zone
- Drinking water protection zonedrinkingWaterProtectionArea
- Distance to indoor swimming pool
- Further away3.7 km
- Distance to nearest permit
- permit nearby95 m
- Distance to charging point
- Charging point further away711 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential arearesidential area
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,880 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels54%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)146 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.694 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away87.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 11 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
98th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 209 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 44: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
57th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
73rd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 283 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 461 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
18th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 228 pupils
Disadvantage score 78: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
49th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 20: more disadvantage than 60% of schools
49th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 43: more disadvantage than 81% of schools
60th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 227 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
16th percentile: low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 269 exam candidates
10th percentile: low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 72 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
82nd percentile: high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 134 exam candidates
33rd percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 265 exam candidates
32nd percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.