Price drops in and around Kudelstaart
More homes in and around Kudelstaart whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hoofdweg 132
Detached at Hoofdweg 132 in Kudelstaart (Kudelstaart neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 174 m² of living space, a 800 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Nieuw Vennep (7.6 km). The nearest primary school is KC De Ruimte (947 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced30 Jul 2026€ 779,000−€ 46,000
- Listed for sale10 Jun 2026€ 825,000
Property details
- Living area
- 174 m²
- Plot
- 800 m²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 776,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kudelstaart, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable11%
- Liveability index: amenities
- Clearly fewer facilities than average-0.112 score
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood2.5 km
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away11.2 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away10.1 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place14.34 ratio
- Child-friendliness (score)
- Little child-friendly34 score
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)6%
- Secondary schools within 3 km
- No secondary school within 3 km0.1
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Very close (<50 m)18 m
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticulture
- Very close10 m
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- Severe flight nuisance23.3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)1,968,876 m²
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby196.94 ha
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.84 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designation
- Archaeological protectionValue – Archaeology 4
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions53 kg/m2/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 570,000
- Distance to nearest greenhouse
- Greenhouse nearby (<500 m), possible light or noise nuisance10 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby9.2 km
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away5.2 km
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing51 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated2%
- Building coverage percentage
- Plenty of open land19%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot646 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels42%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space198 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential14,113 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,018 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.4%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 92 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 39% of schools
63rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 70 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
69th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 84 pupils · total 599 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 333 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
40th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 351 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
35th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 268 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
64th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 423 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
46th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 30: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
43rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 197 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
63rd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
59th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.