Price drops in and around Amstelveen
More homes in and around Amstelveen whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29/07/2026 | Ferdinand Bolstraat 123 C Amsterdam | β¬ 435.000 β¬ 400.000 | -8.1% | 51 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Donau 122 Amstelveen | β¬ 565.000 β¬ 549.000 | -2.8% | 97 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Aalbersestraat 242 G Amsterdam | β¬ 400.000 β¬ 375.000 | -6.3% | 87 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Oeverpad 280 Amsterdam | β¬ 445.000 β¬ 425.000 | -4.5% | 97 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Kloosterstraat 27 Duivendrecht | β¬ 1.145.000 β¬ 1.095.000 | -4.4% | 216 mΒ²159 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Kleiburg 818 Amsterdam | β¬ 350.000 β¬ 339.000 | -3.1% | 68 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Stationsstraat 6 Uithoorn | β¬ 789.500 β¬ 749.000 | -5.1% | 154 mΒ²359 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Bos en Lommerplein 82 Amsterdam | β¬ 550.000 β¬ 525.000 | -4.5% | 80 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Hornweg 212 Aalsmeer | β¬ 1.250.000 β¬ 1.195.000 | -4.4% | 240 mΒ²1548 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 123 1 Amsterdam | β¬ 395.000 β¬ 365.000 | -7.6% | 50 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Falckstraat 31 H Amsterdam | β¬ 2.650.000 β¬ 2.495.000 | -5.8% | 188 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Gedempte sloot 34 Aalsmeer | β¬ 399.500 β¬ 389.500 | -2.5% | 126 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Van Suchtelen van de Haarestraat 83 Amsterdam | β¬ 550.000 β¬ 525.000 | -4.5% | 91 mΒ² | |||
25/07/2026 | Millingenhof 344 Amsterdam | β¬ 375.000 β¬ 369.000 | -1.6% | 89 mΒ² | |||
25/07/2026 | Cruquiuskade 5 Amsterdam | β¬ 1.145.000 β¬ 1.095.000 | -4.4% | 126 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van Baerlestraat 1 3A Amsterdam | β¬ 850.000 β¬ 800.000 | -5.9% | 87 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Korte Ouderkerkerdijk 1 X2 Amsterdam | β¬ 4.500.000 β¬ 4.450.000 | -1.1% | 334 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zuider IJdijk 127 Amsterdam | β¬ 725.000 β¬ 680.000 | -6.2% | 172 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Type A appartement A9 Amstelhoek | β¬ 686.000 β¬ 684.000 | -0.3% | 97 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Prinsengracht 215 M Amsterdam | β¬ 469.000 β¬ 449.000 | -4.3% | 40 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Donau 122
Apartment at Donau 122 in Amstelveen (Watercirkelbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1971 and has 101 mΒ² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Amsteltrein (5.2 km). The nearest primary school is Reformatorische Basisschool De Akker (281 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted29 Jul 2026β¬ 549,000ββ¬ 16,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 565,000
Property details
- Living area
- 101 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1971
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- β¬ 477,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Watercirkelbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyβ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellβ
- Very densely populated255 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)β
- high share20.5%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)β
- High16.4%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)β
- Well above national average⬠615,000
- Distance to interchange stationβ
- Far away6.8 km
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)β
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)81.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)β
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)β
- High1.8%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress44 Β°C
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Masts within 300 mβ
- Many transmission masts nearby6
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)β
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)β
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)β
- Deep (0.5β2 m)0.76 m
- Flood risk classβ
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designationβ
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 5
- Shared plotβ
- Shared plotYes
- Distance to airportβ
- Nearby7.5 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)β
- Above-average nuisance7.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)β
- Elevated2%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectβ
- Noticeably warmer1.1 Β°C
- Can find cooling outside the homeβ
- Below the national average46%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyβ
- Below the national average45.8%
- Proportion of flexible employment contractsβ
- Much flexible work36.1%Β· NL 27%
- Zoning purpose (main category)β
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)β
- Very generous plot625 mΒ²
- Energy index (primary fossil)β
- Efficient (label A/B)188 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy labelβ
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)β
- Rising property values8.3%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmβ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOββ
- Very low0.584 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityβ
- Far away13.6 km
- Distance to biomass plantβ
- At distance (>3 km)13.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits Β· 6 construction plans within 500 m Β· 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
66th percentile: average Β· ROUTE 8 Β· grade 8: 15 pupils Β· total 83 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 204 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
83rd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 23 pupils Β· total 187 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 213 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 12% of schools
46th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 55 pupils Β· total 395 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
51st percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 45 pupils Β· total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 62% of schools
93rd percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 26 pupils Β· total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 4: more disadvantage than 24% of schools
93rd percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 57 pupils Β· total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 22 pupils Β· total 205 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 18 pupils Β· total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 35% of schools
47th percentile: average Β· 90% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 327 exam candidates
25th percentile: average Β· 89% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 298 exam candidates
6th percentile: low Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 87 exam candidates
57th percentile: average Β· 91% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 262 exam candidates
47th percentile: average Β· 92% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 120 exam candidates
20th percentile: low Β· 89% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 45 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
92nd percentile: high Β· 100% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 19 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.