Price drops in and around Aalsmeer
More homes in and around Aalsmeer whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27/07/2026 | Gedempte sloot 34 Aalsmeer | € 399.500 € 389.500 | -2.5% | 126 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van Baerlestraat 1 3A Amsterdam | € 850.000 € 800.000 | -5.9% | 87 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Heldringstraat 2 Haarlem | € 550.000 € 535.000 | -2.7% | 118 m²144 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Korte Ouderkerkerdijk 1 X2 Amsterdam | € 4.500.000 € 4.450.000 | -1.1% | 334 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Type A appartement A9 Amstelhoek | € 686.000 € 684.000 | -0.3% | 97 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Ottho Heldringstraat 27 U Amsterdam | € 795.000 € 750.000 | -5.7% | 141 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Overschiestraat 17 D3 Amsterdam | € 399.000 € 375.000 | -6.0% | 61 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Overschiestraat 17 C3 Amsterdam | € 399.000 € 375.000 | -6.0% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Olympiaplein 152 2 Amsterdam | € 825.000 € 775.000 | -6.1% | 101 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Aalburgplein 31 Hoofddorp | € 445.000 € 425.000 | -4.5% | 79 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Palestrinastraat 29 1 Amsterdam | € 1.320.000 € 1.285.000 | -2.6% | 89 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Blasiusstraat 74 D Amsterdam | € 637.500 € 625.000 | -2.0% | 76 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Cornelis Troostplein 3 C Amsterdam | € 475.000 € 440.000 | -7.4% | 46 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Machineweg 290 Aalsmeer | € 2.595.000 € 2.500.000 | -3.7% | 675 m²2965 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | In het Midden 61 Uithoorn | € 675.000 € 640.000 | -5.2% | 149 m²256 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kinderdijkstraat 87 1 Amsterdam | € 575.000 € 495.000 | -13.9% | 57 m² | 1 0 0 | ||
21/07/2026 | Savelsbos 47 Hoofddorp | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 113 m²242 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kierkegaardstraat 51 Amstelveen | € 395.000 € 350.000 | -11.4% | 87 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Legmeerdijk 342 Aalsmeer | € 1.295.000 € 1.225.000 | -5.4% | 396 m²1755 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Goudsbloem 64 Nieuwveen | € 675.000 € 649.995 | -3.7% | 132 m²182 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Gedempte sloot 34
Apartment at Gedempte sloot 34 in Aalsmeer (Centrum neighbourhood). The home was built in 1958 and has 97 m² of living space, 4 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Hoofddorp (4.5 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Samen Een (244 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026€ 389,500−€ 10,000
- Sold10 Jun 2026€ 399,500
Property details
- Living area
- 97 m²
- Construction year
- 1958
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 374,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Centrum, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Poor (label F/G)395 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- PoorG
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away6.5 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place3.26 ratio
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Directly next to airport4.7 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Severe flight nuisance26.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 kmⓘ
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)70,635 m²
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Environmental health risk (MGR)ⓘ
- High environmental health risk7.9%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)ⓘ
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)ⓘ
- Significant ground subsidence-15 mm/yr
- Foundation riskⓘ
- High risklarge
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)ⓘ
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Dual designationⓘ
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 2
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Elevated emissions73 kg/m2/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Above national average€ 570,000
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)90 m
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site0.9 km
- Distance to tram/metro lineⓘ
- Far away4.7 km
- Noise loadⓘ
- Heavy64 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Disturbing55 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.1%
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values8.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.649 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away15.2 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)15.2 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.5 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)6.7 km
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Far from rail3.6 km
- Distance to arable cropⓘ
- Far away (>250 m)678 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
43rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 197 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
64th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 423 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
46th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 30: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
69th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 84 pupils · total 599 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 70 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
71st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 18% of schools
61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 395 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 92 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 39% of schools
87th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 131 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 6% of schools
63rd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
59th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.