Price drops in and around Lelystad
More homes in and around Lelystad whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Reygersbeek 325
Terraced house at Reygersbeek 325 in Lelystad (Saerdam, Vliegend Hert, Fortuijn neighbourhood). The home was built in 2026 and has 176 m² of living space, a 107 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Lelystad Centrum (2.5 km). The nearest primary school is De Finnjol (699 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jul 2026€ 499,000−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale30 May 2026€ 515,000
Property details
- Living area
- 176 m²
- Plot
- 107 m²
- Construction year
- 2026
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 187,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Saerdam, Vliegend Hert, Fortuijn, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress49 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood2.5 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Liveability index: amenities
- Clearly fewer facilities than average-0.1211 score
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure6
- Secondary schools within 3 km
- No secondary school within 3 km0
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-35.3 mm/yr
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Little roof space6 m²
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average35%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions10 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)44 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,024 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values12.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 4 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 129 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
52nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
40th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
32nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
28th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 135 pupils
Disadvantage score 64 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 387 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
44th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
2nd percentile — low · 71% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 122 exam candidates
11th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 259 exam candidates
42nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 195 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.