Price drops in and around Lelystad
More homes in and around Lelystad whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Zilverparkkade 105
Apartment at Zilverparkkade 105 in Lelystad (Stadhuisstraat neighbourhood). The home was built in 2010 and has 86 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Lelystad Centrum (283 m). The nearest primary school is De Tjalk (614 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted26 Jun 2026€ 389,500−€ 10,500
- Sold (conditional)24 Jun 2026
- Under offer17 Jun 2026
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 400,000
Property details
- Living area
- 86 m²
- Construction year
- 2010
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 389,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stadhuisstraat, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside45%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes70.8%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental62%
- Experienced health (very) good (neighbourhood)
- clearly below national average60.3%
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical510 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values12.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.332 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away47.8 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits within 500 m · 4 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 251 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 387 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
40th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 160 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
44th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
28th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 135 pupils
Disadvantage score 64 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 158 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
2nd percentile — low · 71% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 122 exam candidates
11th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 259 exam candidates
42nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 195 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.