Price drops in and around Nijmegen
More homes in and around Nijmegen whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Schependomlaan 53
Semi-detached at Schependomlaan 53 in Nijmegen (Hees neighbourhood). The home was built in 1920 and has 150 m² of living space, a 473 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Nijmegen (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is Basissch de Zonnewende (740 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 925,000−€ 50,000
- For sale3 Jun 2026
- Off funda26 May 2026€ 975,000
Property details
- Living area
- 150 m²
- Plot
- 473 m²
- Construction year
- 1920
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 711,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hees, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable9%
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.1 km
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)11%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby19
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby24
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot254 m above sea level
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.83 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)905 m
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated2%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.5 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average53%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Below the national average51.9%
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work38.1%· NL 27%
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- above-average many low incomes51.2%
- Distance to planned asylum accommodation
- Nearby (<1 km)399 m
- Central lottery for primary school in municipality
- Municipality with central primary school ballotYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot302 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average32%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space162 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential11,113 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield981 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
11th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
18th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 49% of schools
55th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 80 pupils · total 623 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 32% of schools
60th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 315 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
20th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 35: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
10th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 74: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
74th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 68 pupils · total 474 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 442 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 174 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
no exam results · PRO
69th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 113 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 54 exam candidates
81st percentile: high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 154 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 245 exam candidates
62nd percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 135 exam candidates
93rd percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 122 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
65th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 127 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.