Price drops in and around Nijmegen
More homes in and around Nijmegen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Treubstraat 96
Semi-detached at Treubstraat 96 in Nijmegen (Hatert neighbourhood). The home was built in 1959 and has 98 m² of living space, a 245 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Nijmegen Goffert (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Vossenburcht (164 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced10 Jul 2026€ 419,000−€ 31,000
- Listed for sale30 May 2026€ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 98 m²
- Plot
- 245 m²
- Construction year
- 1959
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 437,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hatert, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby18
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes66%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental61%
- Building coverage percentage
- Plenty of open land25%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot183 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average29%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space58 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical720 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,961 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Good yield980 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 45 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
31st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 144 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
40th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 191 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
4th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 150 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
44th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 300 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 386 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
57th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 366 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
65th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 127 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 279 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 245 exam candidates
69th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 113 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 54 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 122 exam candidates
77th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 352 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.