Price drops in and around Arnhem
More homes in and around Arnhem whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27/07/2026 | St. Antonielaan 223 1 Arnhem | β¬ 449.000 β¬ 425.000 | -5.3% | 106 mΒ² | |||
27/07/2026 | Teteringenstraat 20 Arnhem | β¬ 380.000 β¬ 370.000 | -2.6% | 111 mΒ²127 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Javastraat 21 Arnhem | β¬ 280.000 β¬ 250.000 | -10.7% | 69 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Bakenbergseweg 250 Arnhem | β¬ 1.995.000 β¬ 1.850.000 | -7.3% | 350 mΒ²5750 mΒ² | |||
22/07/2026 | Kwekerijstraat garage J-23 Arnhem | β¬ 41.000 β¬ 39.000 | -4.9% | β | |||
22/07/2026 | Zutphensestraatweg 57 Velp (GE) | β¬ 650.000 β¬ 629.500 | -3.1% | 126 mΒ² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kersenbongerd 7 Huissen | β¬ 445.000 β¬ 425.000 | -4.5% | 135 mΒ²157 mΒ² | |||
21/07/2026 | Bauerstraat 31 4 Arnhem | β¬ 345.000 β¬ 319.500 | -7.4% | 91 mΒ² | |||
21/07/2026 | Roermondsplein 38 1 Arnhem | β¬ 435.000 β¬ 385.000 | -11.5% | 83 mΒ² | |||
20/07/2026 | Utrechtsestraat 33 3 Arnhem | β¬ 285.000 β¬ 265.000 | -7.0% | 79 mΒ² | |||
17/07/2026 | Meander 85 Bemmel | β¬ 499.500 β¬ 487.500 | -2.4% | 125 mΒ²140 mΒ² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hofsingel 23 B Arnhem | β¬ 32.500 β¬ 27.500 | -15.4% | β | |||
16/07/2026 | Jane Addamsstraat 13 Arnhem | β¬ 539.000 β¬ 525.000 | -2.6% | 135 mΒ²215 mΒ² | |||
16/07/2026 | Bothaweg 9 Oosterbeek | β¬ 729.000 β¬ 652.000 | -10.6% | 156 mΒ²605 mΒ² | |||
16/07/2026 | Walstraat 4 8 Arnhem | β¬ 550.000 β¬ 495.000 | -10.0% | 142 mΒ² | |||
15/07/2026 | Den Heuvel 126 Velp (GE) | β¬ 275.000 β¬ 260.000 | -5.5% | 79 mΒ² | |||
14/07/2026 | Witsenstraat 12 3 Arnhem | β¬ 485.000 β¬ 450.000 | -7.2% | 133 mΒ² | |||
14/07/2026 | PrΓΌmelaan 34 Arnhem | β¬ 1.095.000 β¬ 1.050.000 | -4.1% | 197 mΒ²316 mΒ² | 0 1 0 | ||
13/07/2026 | De Wiltstraat 43 Arnhem | β¬ 275.000 β¬ 250.000 | -9.1% | 43 mΒ² | |||
13/07/2026 | Dominicanenweg 47 Arnhem | β¬ 639.500 β¬ 619.500 | -3.1% | 135 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
St. Antonielaan 223 1
Apartment at St. Antonielaan 223 in Arnhem (Graaf Ottoplein e.o. neighbourhood). The home was built in 1902 and has 45 mΒ² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Arnhem Velperpoort (759 m). The nearest primary school is Jan Ligthartschool (128 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026β¬ 425,000ββ¬ 24,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 449,000
Property details
- Living area
- 45 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1902
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- β¬ 212,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Graaf Ottoplein e.o., compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyβ
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)β
- Poor (label F/G)339 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy labelβ
- PoorF
- Residents in 100m grid cellβ
- Very densely populated140 persons
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)β
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.6%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)β
- Much building pressure23
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)β
- High3.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)β
- High2.6%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress45 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)β
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeβ
- Few people find cooling outside39.2%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyβ
- Few people can cool off indoors36.4%
- Shared plotβ
- Shared plotYes
- Calculated COβ emissionsβ
- Elevated emissions62 kg/m2/yr
- Number of soil surveysβ
- Soil survey registered6
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)β
- Above-average nuisance6.3%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)β
- Elevated10.1 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)β
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)β
- Elevated1.3%
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmβ
- Multiple sources3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Voltage level of nearest lineβ
- Heavier line (150 kV)150 kV
- Zoning purpose (main category)β
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)β
- Rising property values11.7%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmβ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOββ
- Very low0.628 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityβ
- Far away6.4 km
- Distance to biomass plantβ
- At distance (>3 km)17.1 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceβ
- ample distance1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineβ
- Far away (>2 km)3.5 km
- Distance to sprayed cropβ
- Far away (>250 m)400 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
23 permits Β· 2 construction plans within 500 m Β· 22 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
60th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 54 pupils Β· total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 36 pupils Β· total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
22nd percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 19 pupils Β· total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 59: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
38th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 14 pupils Β· total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 53% of schools
80th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 17 pupils Β· total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
40th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 15 pupils Β· total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 121: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
99th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 21 pupils Β· total 142 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
76th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 52 pupils Β· total 347 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 37 pupils Β· total 280 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 43% of schools
77th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 27 pupils Β· total 210 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile: average Β· 99% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 83 exam candidates
44th percentile: average Β· 88% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 228 exam candidates
no exam results Β· BRUGJAAR
33rd percentile: average Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· VWO Β· 109 exam candidates
61st percentile: average Β· 92% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 180 exam candidates
41st percentile: average Β· 88% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 217 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
81st percentile: high Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 6.6 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 91 exam candidates
no exam results Β· BRUGJAAR
57th percentile: average Β· 92% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 26 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.