Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Aarhuispad 83
Apartment at Aarhuispad 83 in Rotterdam (Oosterflank neighbourhood). The home was built in 1981 and has 99 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Oosterflank (257 m). The nearest primary school is Hiraa (239 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jul 2026€ 325,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 99 m²
- Construction year
- 1981
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 341,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oosterflank, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated125 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1384 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1429 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share21.6%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High19.5%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental58%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away8.7 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.77 ratio
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime84.2 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.4%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)73.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors44.9%
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-14.9 mm/yr
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater22 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)3.38 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels8%
- Distance to airport
- Nearby8.3 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance8%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Voltage level of nearest line
- Heavier line (150 kV)150 kV
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.8 °C
- Share of social assistance recipients
- Elevated6.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,135 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical10 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.915 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away18.9 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)28.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
no recent test score · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
73rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 73: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
63rd percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
20th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 222 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
22nd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 65% of schools
31st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 267 pupils
Disadvantage score 50: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
3rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 117 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 88 pupils · total 685 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 27% of schools
38th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
9th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
16th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
72nd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
46th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
46th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.