Price drops in and around Delft
More homes in and around Delft whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22/07/2026 | Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 Delft | € 370.000 € 360.000 | -2.7% | 104 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Lisstraat 14 A01 Rotterdam | € 294.500 € 275.000 | -6.6% | 51 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Newtonplein 21 A Den Haag | € 239.500 € 219.500 | -8.3% | 29 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Goudsesingel 270 C Rotterdam | € 275.000 € 260.000 | -5.5% | 45 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Overwater 7 Zoetermeer | € 500.000 € 485.000 | -3.0% | 128 m²138 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kievitstraat 11 Honselersdijk | € 445.000 € 422.500 | -5.1% | 88 m²134 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Nieuwstraat 23 A Schiedam | € 395.000 € 374.000 | -5.3% | 97 m²40 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Boddaertstraat 28 Den Haag | € 399.000 € 375.000 | -6.0% | 98 m²87 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Loosduinsekade 571 Den Haag | € 315.000 € 300.000 | -4.8% | 88 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Alphons Ariënsstraat 186 Schiedam | € 349.500 € 325.000 | -7.0% | 75 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Hollandiahof 32 Schiedam | € 575.000 € 539.000 | -6.3% | 128 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Dirk Schäferplein 126 Schiedam | € 275.000 € 269.500 | -2.0% | 83 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 7 f Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 265.000 | -3.6% | 52 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | De Genestetlaan 256 Den Haag | € 387.500 € 375.000 | -3.2% | 135 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Van Innevelthof 21 Maasdijk | € 500.000 € 495.000 | -1.0% | 106 m²150 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hammarskjöldlaan 467 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 15.000 € 13.500 | -10.0% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Agrippinastraat 17 Voorburg | € 695.000 € 669.000 | -3.7% | 109 m²106 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Henegouwerlaan 25 A Rotterdam | € 395.000 € 375.000 | -5.1% | 115 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Schieweg 244 C02 Rotterdam | € 349.500 € 324.500 | -7.2% | 102 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | C.T. Storklaan 583 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 789.000 € 779.000 | -1.3% | 120 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84
Apartment at Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 in Delft (Aart van der Leeuwbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 105 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Delft Campus (1 km). The nearest primary school is IKC De Eglantier Voorhof (404 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 360,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 370,000
Property details
- Living area
- 105 m²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 356,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Aart van der Leeuwbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away10.9 km
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated180 persons
- Liveability scoreⓘ
- clearly below average-0.1104 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- high share19.5%
- Net labour participationⓘ
- Low58%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot3,921 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.06 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away33.2 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)37.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)8.9 km
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- No transmitter mast in the neighbourhood338 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 17 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
86th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 366 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
no recent test score · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 198 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 359 pupils
Disadvantage score 165 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
64th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
73rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 133 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 108 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
12th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 90 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
23rd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
73rd percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 53 exam candidates
39th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 178 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
51st percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 283 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.