Price drops in and around Capelle aan den IJssel
More homes in and around Capelle aan den IJssel whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Akkerwinde 130
Apartment at Akkerwinde 130 in Capelle aan den IJssel (Akker/Haagwinde neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 66 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Schenkel (234 m). The nearest primary school is De Triangel Capelle (283 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced26 Jun 2026€ 259,000−€ 16,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 275,000
Property details
- Living area
- 66 m²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 266,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Akker/Haagwinde, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions5,337 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.1 km
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away8.1 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated140 persons
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.4%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot926 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.842 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away17.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)26.9 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.3 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 117 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 614 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 222 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 177 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
no recent test score · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 408 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 434 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · PRO
64th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 128 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.