Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Albardagracht 110
Semi-detached at Albardagracht 110 in Amsterdam (Ruys de Beerenbrouckbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2003 and has 145 m² of living space, a 109 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (2.4 km). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool Timotheusschool (254 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced10 Jul 2026€ 625,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale24 Jun 2026€ 650,000
Property details
- Living area
- 145 m²
- Plot
- 109 m²
- Construction year
- 2003
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 673,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Ruys de Beerenbrouckbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby31
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.3%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space43 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)128 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical750 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,037 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 375 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
25th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 440 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 236 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 93 pupils · total 591 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 117 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
60th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
no exam results · PRO
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.