Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Olof Palmeplein 55
Apartment at Olof Palmeplein 55 in Amsterdam (Buikslotermeerplein neighbourhood). The home was built in 1987 and has 72 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Noord (894 m). The nearest primary school is De Buikslotermeer (454 m).
Price & status history
- For sale17 Jul 2026
- Price reduced17 Jul 2026€ 395,000−€ 5,000
- Sold (conditional)3 Jun 2026€ 400,000
Property details
- Living area
- 72 m²
- Construction year
- 1987
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 449,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold expiry: 31-08-2037)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Buikslotermeerplein, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside43.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.5%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby7
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental63%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,440 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average27%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)167 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical470 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.508 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 45 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 87 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
75th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 229 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 279 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 432 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
16th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 256 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
82nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 376 pupils
Disadvantage score 102 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 364 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
38th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 76 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 111 exam candidates
64th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 90 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · HAVO/VWO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
36th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 27 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 25 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 58% passed · CE avg 5.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 12 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.