Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Amerongseberg 33
Terraced house at Amerongseberg 33 in Utrecht (Lunetten-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1991 and has 103 m² of living space, a 110 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Lunetten (937 m). The nearest primary school is Blauwe Aventurijn (254 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer15 Jul 2026
- Relisted2 Jul 2026€ 500,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale13 Jun 2026€ 525,000
Property details
- Living area
- 103 m²
- Plot
- 110 m²
- Construction year
- 1991
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 594,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lunetten-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.3%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated90 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.146 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1155 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot56 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space64 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical710 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,454 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield999 kWh/kWp/yr
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 47 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 219 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 312 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
83rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 21% of schools
98th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
66th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 29% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
92nd percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 172 exam candidates
14th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 270 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 160 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.6 · HAVO · 14 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.