Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Washingtondreef 13 Utrecht | € 335.000 € 320.000 | -4.5% | 67 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Marnixlaan 71 Utrecht | € 301.000 € 275.000 | -8.6% | 44 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Telderslaan 15 Utrecht | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 68 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Noord IJsseldijk 24 IJsselstein | € 1.985.000 € 1.890.000 | -4.8% | 522 m²2655 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Vlotlaan 25 Utrecht | € 499.000 € 475.000 | -4.8% | 83 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Paul Citroenstraat 16 Utrecht | € 875.000 € 869.000 | -0.7% | 147 m²179 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Bolstraat 93 Utrecht | € 599.000 € 545.000 | -9.0% | 97 m²57 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Blauwkapelseweg 15 BS Utrecht | € 695.000 € 645.000 | -7.2% | 113 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Adelboldstraat 23 Utrecht | € 499.000 € 480.000 | -3.8% | 85 m²93 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Beetsstraat 2 14 Utrecht | € 495.000 € 489.000 | -1.2% | 59 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Beetsstraat 2 8 Utrecht | € 489.000 € 485.000 | -0.8% | 59 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Beetsstraat 2 16 Utrecht | € 449.000 € 445.000 | -0.9% | 49 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Beetsstraat 2 13 Utrecht | € 489.000 € 449.000 | -8.2% | 53 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Beetsstraat 2 10 Utrecht | € 445.000 € 439.000 | -1.4% | 49 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Beetsstraat 2 2 Utrecht | € 485.000 € 419.000 | -13.6% | 51 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Maniladreef 24 Utrecht | € 475.000 € 450.000 | -5.3% | 134 m²138 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Beetsstraat 2 7 Utrecht | € 485.000 € 445.000 | -8.3% | 53 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Beetsstraat 2 4 Utrecht | € 439.000 € 435.000 | -0.9% | 49 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Nicolaas Beetsstraat 2 3 Utrecht | € 485.000 € 435.000 | -10.3% | 60 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Oudegracht 38 C Utrecht | € 386.000 € 376.000 | -2.6% | 38 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Arthur van Schendelstraat 64
Apartment at Arthur van Schendelstraat 64 in Utrecht (Hooch Boulandt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1991 and has 100 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Vaartsche Rijn (356 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Agatha Snellen (365 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced7 Jul 2026€ 685,000−€ 40,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 725,000
Property details
- Living area
- 100 m²
- Construction year
- 1991
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 654,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hooch Boulandt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby7
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside35.9%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors38%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated255 persons
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot4,521 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions14 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)63 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical240 m³
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)ⓘ
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.62 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 40 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
97th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 211 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 90 pupils · total 509 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
70th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 150 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 437 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 219 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 276 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 291 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 172 exam candidates
14th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 270 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.