Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Baan 182 C02
Apartment at Baan 182 in Rotterdam (Stadsdriehoek neighbourhood). The home was built in 1930 and has 46 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Leuvehaven (166 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Het Landje (140 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 259,000−€ 6,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 265,000
Property details
- Living area
- 46 m²
- Construction year
- 1930
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 254,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stadsdriehoek, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated135 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1526 score
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime151.9 per 1,000 residents
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate€ 6.42
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.7%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.3%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure21
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity11
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)338 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby18
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside29.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34.7%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels0%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions59 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Inefficient (label E)322 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- UneconomicalE
- Distance to nearest emission source
- nearby338 m
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)65 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby5.7 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance6.4%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.6 µg/m³
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical60 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.123 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away20.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)25.8 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4.2 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away5,289 m
- Distance to nearest high-voltage power line
- Far from high voltage1.6 km
- Distance to nearest greenhouse
- No greenhouse in the vicinity (>2 km)4.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
18 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
66th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
48th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
27th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
50th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
52nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 210 pupils
Disadvantage score 39: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
67th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
54th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 529 pupils
Disadvantage score 19: more disadvantage than 58% of schools
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
97th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
31st percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
62nd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
97th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.