Price drops in and around Almere
More homes in and around Almere whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27/07/2026 | Bakboord 5 Almere | β¬ 1.195.000 β¬ 1.095.000 | -8.4% | 241 mΒ²458 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Sumatraweg 73 Almere | β¬ 375.000 β¬ 350.000 | -6.7% | 76 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Pieter van Damstraat 42 F Almere | β¬ 310.000 β¬ 299.000 | -3.5% | 59 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zuidwal 17 Huizen | β¬ 379.500 β¬ 372.500 | -1.8% | 77 mΒ² | |||
24/07/2026 | Fokkeboom 52 Almere | β¬ 895.000 β¬ 825.000 | -7.8% | 157 mΒ²249 mΒ² | |||
23/07/2026 | Brommy en Tommystraat 17 Almere | β¬ 555.000 β¬ 515.000 | -7.2% | 135 mΒ²166 mΒ² | |||
21/07/2026 | Edelhertweg 25 Almere | β¬ 515.000 β¬ 475.000 | -7.8% | 133 mΒ²140 mΒ² | |||
20/07/2026 | Azorenweg 37 Almere | β¬ 560.000 β¬ 550.000 | -1.8% | 162 mΒ²152 mΒ² | |||
17/07/2026 | Rijksweg 56 Naarden | β¬ 950.000 β¬ 899.000 | -5.4% | 154 mΒ²413 mΒ² | |||
17/07/2026 | Mastgatpad 46 Almere | β¬ 429.000 β¬ 425.000 | -0.9% | 104 mΒ²126 mΒ² | |||
17/07/2026 | Geerten Gossaertpad 9 Almere | β¬ 475.000 β¬ 460.000 | -3.2% | 110 mΒ²134 mΒ² | |||
16/07/2026 | Koetsierbaan 223 Almere | β¬ 595.000 β¬ 575.000 | -3.4% | 129 mΒ² | |||
16/07/2026 | Tuinderswerf 1 Almere | β¬ 350.000 β¬ 325.000 | -7.1% | 80 mΒ² | |||
15/07/2026 | Nobellaan 45 Almere | β¬ 935.000 β¬ 899.500 | -3.8% | 182 mΒ²195 mΒ² | |||
15/07/2026 | Globeplein 38 Almere | β¬ 474.000 β¬ 435.000 | -8.2% | 121 mΒ² | |||
15/07/2026 | William Jamesstraat 25 Almere | β¬ 1.190.000 β¬ 1.169.500 | -1.7% | 197 mΒ²2002 mΒ² | |||
14/07/2026 | De Diagonaal 59 Almere | β¬ 485.000 β¬ 465.000 | -4.1% | 124 mΒ² | |||
14/07/2026 | Langestraat 39 Huizen | β¬ 865.000 β¬ 795.000 | -8.1% | 138 mΒ²193 mΒ² | |||
11/07/2026 | Kajuit 114 Almere | β¬ 465.000 β¬ 450.000 | -3.2% | 111 mΒ² | |||
10/07/2026 | Buitenplaats Oosterwold 73 Almere | β¬ 1.100.000 β¬ 950.000 | -13.6% | 218 mΒ²2514 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Bakboord 5
Terraced house at Bakboord 5 in Almere (Noorderplassen Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1992 and has 186 mΒ² of living space, a 458 mΒ² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Almere Centrum (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare basisschool De Heliotroop (828 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced27 Jul 2026β¬ 1,095,000ββ¬ 100,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 1,195,000
Property details
- Living area
- 186 mΒ²
- Plot
- 458 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1992
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- β¬ 821,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Noorderplassen Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to charging pointβ
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.6 km
- General practitioners within 1 kmβ
- No GP within 1 km0
- GPs within 3 kmβ
- Few GPs nearby1.9
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)β
- Low (bottom quarter)10%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)β
- High3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)β
- High4.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress44 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)β
- Above the standardYes
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)β
- Significant ground subsidence-16.6 mm/yr
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)β
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.65 m
- Flood risk classβ
- High flood risklarge
- Share of renewable energyβ
- moderate share sustainable36%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmβ
- One within 1 km1
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityβ
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)967 m
- Distance to nearest external safety facilityβ
- Nearby (within area of influence)358 m
- Distance to tram/metro lineβ
- Far away14 km
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)β
- Elevated4.6%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)β
- Elevated1.8%
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmβ
- Multiple sources3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Voltage level of nearest lineβ
- Heavier line (150 kV)150 kV
- Zoning purpose (main category)β
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotβ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaβ
- Very spacious plot270 mΒ²
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerβ
- Many solar panels49%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsβ
- Ample roof space210 mΒ²
- Energy index (primary fossil)β
- Efficient (label A/B)74 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy labelβ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionβ
- Economical0 mΒ³
- Solar potential roofβ
- Very high potential13,818 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m Β· 2 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
11th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 54% of schools
51st percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 6 pupils Β· total 99 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 62% of schools
84th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 19 pupils Β· total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
75th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 98 pupils Β· total 831 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
26th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 40 pupils Β· total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 4% of schools
11th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 10 pupils Β· total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
92nd percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 25 pupils Β· total 254 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 4% of schools
3rd percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 9 pupils Β· total 91 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 27% of schools
30th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 9 pupils Β· total 124 pupils
Disadvantage score 15: more disadvantage than 52% of schools
53rd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 41 pupils Β· total 417 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results Β· HAVO
8th percentile: low Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 79 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
38th percentile: average Β· 93% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 195 exam candidates
7th percentile: low Β· 81% passed Β· CE avg 6.2 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 325 exam candidates
no exam results Β· HAVO/VWO
30th percentile: average Β· 84% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VWO Β· 79 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low Β· 75% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 280 exam candidates
1st percentile: low Β· 66% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 261 exam candidates
no exam results Β· BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.