Price drops in and around Almere
More homes in and around Almere whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Tuinderswerf 1
Apartment at Tuinderswerf 1 in Almere (Rozenwerf en Tuinderswerf neighbourhood). The home was built in 2014 and has 80 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Almere Muziekwijk (4.1 km). The nearest primary school is RK Jenaplanschool De Sterrenzee (570 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jul 2026€ 325,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 80 m²
- Construction year
- 2014
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 339,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rozenwerf en Tuinderswerf, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.5 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.4
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1239 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,399 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average35%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions18 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)100 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.41 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 4 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
87th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 126 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 428 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 281 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
63rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 538 pupils
Disadvantage score 114 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 0% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 256 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 408 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
no exam results · PRO
25th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
30th percentile — average · 84% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 280 exam candidates
38th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 195 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
7th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 325 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 241 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.