Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Knokkestraat 65 Amsterdam | € 619.100 € 619.000 | -0.0% | 125 m²62 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Parosstraat 6 Amsterdam | € 1.695.000 € 1.495.000 | -11.8% | 258 m²385 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Willem de Zwijgerlaan 334 C14 Amsterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 51 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Banne Buikslootlaan 125 Amsterdam | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 61 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Oeverpad 191 Amsterdam | € 585.000 € 550.000 | -6.0% | 122 m² | |||
19/07/2026 | Paulus Potterstraat 24 A Amsterdam | € 4.000.000 € 3.950.000 | -1.3% | 238 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Cornelis Vermuydenstraat 92 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 65 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Surinameplein 10 H Amsterdam | € 1.265.000 € 1.095.000 | -13.4% | 171 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Sibogastraat 93 Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 450.000 | -10.0% | 63 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Tweede Boerhaavestraat 70 1 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 62 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Kloveniersburgwal 99 F Amsterdam | € 695.000 € 675.000 | -2.9% | 74 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Ceintuurbaan 167 3 Amsterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.245.000 | -0.4% | 149 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Olof Palmeplein 55 Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 395.000 | -1.3% | 76 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leerdamhof 7 Amsterdam | € 450.000 € 375.000 | -16.7% | 74 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Egelantiersstraat 122 D Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 485.000 | -3.0% | 62 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Durgerdammerdijk 173 Amsterdam | € 3.800.000 € 3.500.000 | -7.9% | 439 m²12680 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Middenweg 402 Amsterdam | € 675.000 € 625.000 | -7.4% | 95 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Vesuvius 26 Amstelveen | € 350.000 € 325.000 | -7.1% | 56 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korte Geuzenstraat 700 Amsterdam | € 110.000 € 107.500 | -2.3% | — | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Witsenstraat 2 D Amsterdam | € 599.000 € 575.000 | -4.0% | 50 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Bos en Lommerplantsoen 9 A
Home at Bos en Lommerplantsoen 9 in Amsterdam (Robert Scottbuurt-West neighbourhood). The home has 36 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label D. The nearest railway station is De Vlugtlaan (544 m). The nearest primary school is Enderun Hisar Amsterdam (285 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted26 Jun 2026€ 275,000−€ 20,000
- Under offer18 Jun 2026
- Listed for sale30 May 2026€ 295,000
Property details
- Living area
- 36 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 290,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 31 January 2062)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Robert Scottbuurt-West, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- High emissions2,564 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to motorwayⓘ
- Very close33 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance9.1%
- Noise loadⓘ
- Loud66 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby30
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Leasehold or freeholdⓘ
- FreeholdNo
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot2,490 m²
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space3,595 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical280 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential14,027 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.656 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)3.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
20 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 42 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 245 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
56th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 414 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.