Price drops in and around Leidschendam
More homes in and around Leidschendam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22/07/2026 | Segbroeklaan 10 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 109 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Hoge Rijndijk 104 B Leiden | € 349.000 € 329.000 | -5.7% | 49 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Van Loostraat 116 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 725.000 | -6.5% | 138 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | San Franciscosingel 10 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 800.000 | -5.9% | 199 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Zeesluisweg 62 D Den Haag | € 560.000 € 524.500 | -6.3% | 75 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Newtonplein 21 A Den Haag | € 239.500 € 219.500 | -8.3% | 29 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Overwater 7 Zoetermeer | € 500.000 € 485.000 | -3.0% | 128 m²138 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Boddaertstraat 28 Den Haag | € 399.000 € 375.000 | -6.0% | 98 m²87 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Loosduinsekade 571 Den Haag | € 315.000 € 300.000 | -4.8% | 88 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Hoekeindseweg 111 Bleiswijk | € 925.000 € 875.000 | -5.4% | 191 m²1250 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 7 f Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 265.000 | -3.6% | 52 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Azaleapark 22 Zoetermeer | € 450.000 € 435.000 | -3.3% | 114 m²135 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | De Genestetlaan 256 Den Haag | € 387.500 € 375.000 | -3.2% | 135 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hammarskjöldlaan 467 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 15.000 € 13.500 | -10.0% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Agrippinastraat 17 Voorburg | € 695.000 € 669.000 | -3.7% | 109 m²106 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | C.T. Storklaan 583 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 789.000 € 779.000 | -1.3% | 120 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kapellaan 28 Den Hoorn (ZH) | € 498.000 € 485.000 | -2.6% | 100 m²95 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Stoeplaan 11 F24 Wassenaar | € 875.000 € 840.000 | -4.0% | 150 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Buizerdlaan 213
Apartment at Buizerdlaan 213 in Leidschendam (Park Veursehout neighbourhood). The home was built in 1998 and has 81 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Mariahoeve (714 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool de Margriet (485 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced22 Jul 2026€ 499,000−€ 26,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 525,000
Property details
- Living area
- 81 m²
- Construction year
- 1998
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 427,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Park Veursehout, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Net labour participationⓘ
- Low60%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away5.2 km
- Catering within 300 mⓘ
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area30
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)ⓘ
- Significant ground subsidence-9.9 mm/yr
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater28 m above sea level
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Above national average€ 480,000
- Within Wbb soil locationⓘ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Noise loadⓘ
- Heavy61 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Disturbing51 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- Elevated1.3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated1.9%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Multiple industrial businesses5
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Multiple sources5
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot2,787 m²
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average29%
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)166 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values8.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.775 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away39.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
99th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
78th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 258 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 455 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
4th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 171 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
54th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 214 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 25% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 503 pupils
Disadvantage score 83 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
60th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 123 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 50 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
95th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 59 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 110 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.