Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Burgemeester Cramergracht 179
Apartment at Burgemeester Cramergracht 179 in Amsterdam (Louis Couperusbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1958 and has 88 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (241 m). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool Pro Rege Noorderhof (585 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted7 Jul 2026€ 550,000−€ 49,000
- Listed for sale6 Jun 2026€ 599,000
Property details
- Living area
- 88 m²
- Construction year
- 1958
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 525,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Louis Couperusbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance12.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby28
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors29.4%
- Share of social assistance recipients
- High9.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,691 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical670 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.656 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)3.8 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)2.5 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away5,277 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 43 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 174 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 117 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.