Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24/07/2026 | De Kempenaerstraat 33 B Rotterdam | € 425.000 € 399.500 | -6.0% | 104 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Churchillplein 118 Rotterdam | € 498.000 € 489.000 | -1.8% | 105 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | De Quackstraat 52 C Rotterdam | € 295.000 € 275.000 | -6.8% | 92 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Witte de Withstraat 19 C Rotterdam | € 389.000 € 349.000 | -10.3% | 65 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Mendelssohnplein 15 D Vlaardingen | € 289.000 € 279.500 | -3.3% | 86 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Van 's-Gravesandestraat 26 B Schiedam | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 99 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Slaghekstraat 75 D Rotterdam | € 335.000 € 325.000 | -3.0% | 99 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Baan 182 C02 Rotterdam | € 265.000 € 259.000 | -2.3% | 42 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kleiweg 197 Rotterdam | € 850.000 € 799.000 | -6.0% | 176 m²75 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kortebrantstraat 29 Rotterdam | € 360.000 € 345.000 | -4.2% | 63 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Berkelselaan 103 Rotterdam | € 425.000 € 422.000 | -0.7% | 90 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Maasboulevard 44 B Spijkenisse | € 425.000 € 399.900 | -5.9% | 118 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Aarhuispad 83 Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 325.000 | -7.1% | 95 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Reling 301 Barendrecht | € 330.000 € 325.000 | -1.5% | 74 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Dalkruid 2 Vlaardingen | € 459.000 € 439.000 | -4.4% | 103 m²107 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Noorderhavenkade 140 A03 Rotterdam | € 375.000 € 350.000 | -6.7% | 77 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Weizichtstraat 21 Rotterdam | € 340.000 € 320.000 | -5.9% | 85 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Grote Visserijstraat 79 B Rotterdam | € 245.000 € 238.000 | -2.9% | 55 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Cannemanstraat 25 Rotterdam | € 399.000 € 385.000 | -3.5% | 106 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Elektroweg 6 B Rotterdam | € 525.000 € 495.000 | -5.7% | 92 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Churchillplein 118
Apartment at Churchillplein 118 in Rotterdam (Stadsdriehoek neighbourhood). The home was built in 1981 and has 90 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Beurs (64 m). The nearest primary school is Rotterdamse Schoolvereniging (375 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 489,000−€ 9,000
- Listed for sale4 Jun 2026€ 498,000
Property details
- Living area
- 90 m²
- Construction year
- 1981
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 398,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stadsdriehoek, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated190 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1526 score
- Green share within 500 mⓘ
- Little greenery4%
- Hospitality within 25 mⓘ
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Catering within 300 mⓘ
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area70
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place1.77 ratio
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsⓘ
- High crime151.9 per 1,000 residents
- Parking tariffⓘ
- Very high rate€ 6.42
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.7%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.3%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure41
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity12
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Very close (<500 m)175 m
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- very nearby175 m
- Noise loadⓘ
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Traffic on your own streetⓘ
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside29.5%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors34.7%
- Masts within 300 mⓘ
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- moderate share sustainable41%
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels0%
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Nearby5.3 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance6.4%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated10.6 µg/m³
- Road traffic noiseⓘ
- Considerable noise19.6%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.4%
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Multiple sources3
- Environmental health risk (MGR)ⓘ
- Elevated6.4%
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot806 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)108 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical60 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.123 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away21 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)26.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
36 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
99th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
48th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
66th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
50th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
27th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
55th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 124: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
36th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
97th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VWO
5th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
8th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.