Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Croesestraat 85
Terraced house at Croesestraat 85 in Utrecht (Rivierenwijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 2001 and has 99 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Vaartsche Rijn (361 m). The nearest primary school is KBS Gertrudis (103 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer6 Jul 2026
- Price reduced22 Jun 2026€ 550,000−€ 25,000
- For sale3 Jun 2026
- Under offer3 Jun 2026€ 575,000
Property details
- Living area
- 99 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 2001
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 680,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rivierenwijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34.4%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated200 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.13 ratio
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,522 m²
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space68 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)141 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical630 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,746 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield999 kWh/kWp/yr
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 38 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 90 pupils · total 509 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
97th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 211 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 219 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
70th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 150 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 312 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 172 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
14th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 270 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.