Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Cruquiuskade 5
Apartment at Cruquiuskade 5 in Amsterdam (Czaar Peterbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2016 and has 127 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Muiderpoort (811 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Oostelijke Eilanden (188 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted25 Jul 2026€ 1,095,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale27 Jun 2026€ 1,145,000
Property details
- Living area
- 127 m²
- Construction year
- 2016
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 1,119,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 31-10-2063)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Czaar Peterbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated205 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1602 score
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime94.3 per 1,000 residents
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate€ 5.37
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.8%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure27
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity8
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.3%
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Strong rail nuisance7.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35.7%
- Category of nearest risk source
- Seveso/BRZO facility nearbySeveso/BRZO
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels2%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 575,000
- Distance to military terrain
- Near military site0.8 km
- Distance to nearest high-voltage substation
- Nearby267 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby12.8 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.2 µg/m³
- Noise load
- Heavy64 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing55 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,497 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions18 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)83 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical530 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
26 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
79th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 421 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
49th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 346 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
30th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 44: more disadvantage than 82% of schools
66th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 18% of schools
57th percentile: average · DOE · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 33% of schools
47th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 176 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
14th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 293 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
96th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 396 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 404 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO · 64 exam candidates
84th percentile: high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 154 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
18th percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 102 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/PRO
58th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 33 exam candidates
92nd percentile: high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 116 exam candidates
90th percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.8 · MAVO · 58 exam candidates
12th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 105 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.