Price drops in and around IJmuiden
More homes in and around IJmuiden whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22/07/2026 | De Lumeystraat 40 IJmuiden | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 152 m²188 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Laan der Nederlanden 66 A Beverwijk | € 422.500 € 400.000 | -5.3% | 124 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Semarangstraat 13 Haarlem | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 93 m²84 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Ladderbeekstraat 33 Velsen-Noord | € 425.000 € 389.000 | -8.5% | 81 m²102 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Pitrus 88 Assendelft | € 699.500 € 669.500 | -4.3% | 141 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Appartement type C 85 Assendelft | € 699.500 € 669.500 | -4.3% | 141 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Karel Doormanstraat 4 F6 Zandvoort | € 439.000 € 429.000 | -2.3% | 86 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Julianaweg 59 Wijk aan Zee | € 1.295.000 € 1.275.000 | -1.5% | 229 m²1495 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Eksterlaan 124 Haarlem | € 335.000 € 325.000 | -3.0% | 62 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | de Ruyterstraat 6 F3 Zandvoort | € 470.000 € 450.000 | -4.3% | 80 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Kritzingerstraat 2 Haarlem | € 520.000 € 500.000 | -3.9% | 87 m²77 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | La Spezia 3 PP Zandvoort | € 37.500 € 35.000 | -6.7% | — | |||
15/07/2026 | Professor Van der Waalsstraat 54 Haarlem | € 700.000 € 699.500 | -0.1% | 112 m²128 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Dorpsstraat 167 Assendelft | € 475.000 € 425.000 | -10.5% | 87 m²370 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Nobelstraat 6 Haarlem | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 208 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Lindenlaan 59 A Zwanenburg | € 498.500 € 495.000 | -0.7% | 94 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Veenland 3 Assendelft | € 835.000 € 815.000 | -2.4% | 185 m²165 m² | |||
11/07/2026 | Leidsevaart 502 RD Haarlem | € 675.000 € 650.000 | -3.7% | 108 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Eikenstraat 59 Beverwijk | € 475.000 € 450.000 | -5.3% | 133 m² | |||
10/07/2026 | Dokter De Liefdestraat 21 Haarlem | € 395.000 € 375.000 | -5.1% | 74 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
De Lumeystraat 40
Semi-detached at De Lumeystraat 40 in IJmuiden (Heidebuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1929 and has 183 m² of living space, a 188 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Driehuis (2.3 km). The nearest primary school is De Vliegende Hollander (242 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 525,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale14 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 183 m²
- Plot
- 188 m²
- Construction year
- 1929
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 506,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Heidebuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Obesity (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High18.6%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away9.7 km
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.7%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.1%
- Serious noise nuisance from wind turbines (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Strong turbine noise3.2%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High5.9%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High3.9%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby9
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Hub height nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Very high turbine175.5 m
- Wind turbines within 1 kmⓘ
- Multiple wind turbines within 1 km2
- Wind turbines within 3 kmⓘ
- Many wind turbines nearby6
- Masts within 300 mⓘ
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Number of risk sources within 1 kmⓘ
- Many sources9
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)ⓘ
- Deep, risk of pile rot160 m above sea level
- Dual designationⓘ
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 2
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Above national average€ 463,000
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- nearby428 m
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Nearby (500 m – 1 km)839 m
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)87 m
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site2 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance6.5%
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High flight nuisance12.2%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated4.7%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- Elevated1.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot86 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- High share of renewable energy80%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions10 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space105 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)42 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA+++
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential8,723 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
17 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 10 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
28th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 433 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 27% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 596 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 417 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 176 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
20th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 338 pupils
Disadvantage score 83 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
26th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
98th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 344 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
39th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 287 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 282 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 15 exam candidates
80th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 72 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 63 exam candidates
40th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
82nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 89% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 73 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.