Price drops in and around Schiedam
More homes in and around Schiedam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dirk Schäferplein 126
Apartment at Dirk Schäferplein 126 in Schiedam (Mozartbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1968 and has 82 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Schiedam Nieuwland (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is El Furkan Basisschool (246 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced21 Jul 2026€ 269,500−€ 5,500
- For sale6 Jun 2026
- Under offer2 Jun 2026€ 275,000
Property details
- Living area
- 82 m²
- Construction year
- 1968
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 237,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold end date: 30-06-2064)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Mozartbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions4,802 kg/m2/yr
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors39.8%
- Share of social assistance recipients
- High8.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot681 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical650 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.378 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away28.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)30.6 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 407 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
30th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 197 pupils
Disadvantage score 92 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 271 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 370 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 30% of schools
65th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
46th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
no recent test score · total 366 pupils
75th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 308 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
27th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 355 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 41% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 359 pupils
Disadvantage score 96 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
no exam results · VBO
20th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VWO · 78 exam candidates
28th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 75 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
43rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 168 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 62 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
28th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 243 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.