Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Knokkestraat 65 Amsterdam | € 619.100 € 619.000 | -0.0% | 125 m²62 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Parosstraat 6 Amsterdam | € 1.695.000 € 1.495.000 | -11.8% | 258 m²385 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Willem de Zwijgerlaan 334 C14 Amsterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 51 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Banne Buikslootlaan 125 Amsterdam | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 61 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Oeverpad 191 Amsterdam | € 585.000 € 550.000 | -6.0% | 122 m² | |||
19/07/2026 | Paulus Potterstraat 24 A Amsterdam | € 4.000.000 € 3.950.000 | -1.3% | 238 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Cornelis Vermuydenstraat 92 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 65 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Surinameplein 10 H Amsterdam | € 1.265.000 € 1.095.000 | -13.4% | 171 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Sibogastraat 93 Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 450.000 | -10.0% | 63 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Tweede Boerhaavestraat 70 1 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 62 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Kloveniersburgwal 99 F Amsterdam | € 695.000 € 675.000 | -2.9% | 74 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Ceintuurbaan 167 3 Amsterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.245.000 | -0.4% | 149 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Olof Palmeplein 55 Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 395.000 | -1.3% | 76 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leerdamhof 7 Amsterdam | € 450.000 € 375.000 | -16.7% | 74 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Egelantiersstraat 122 D Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 485.000 | -3.0% | 62 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Durgerdammerdijk 173 Amsterdam | € 3.800.000 € 3.500.000 | -7.9% | 439 m²12680 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Middenweg 402 Amsterdam | € 675.000 € 625.000 | -7.4% | 95 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Vesuvius 26 Amstelveen | € 350.000 € 325.000 | -7.1% | 56 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korte Geuzenstraat 700 Amsterdam | € 110.000 € 107.500 | -2.3% | — | |||
16/07/2026 | Nicolaas Witsenstraat 2 D Amsterdam | € 599.000 € 575.000 | -4.0% | 50 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Droogbak 2 E
Home at Droogbak 2 in Amsterdam (Haarlemmerbuurt-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1721 and has 84 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Centraal (448 m). The nearest primary school is Burght (278 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jul 2026€ 675,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 695,000
Property details
- Living area
- 84 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 1721
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 703,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Haarlemmerbuurt-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby16
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Environmental health risk (MGR)ⓘ
- High environmental health risk7.8%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside39.9%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors36.3%
- Leasehold or freeholdⓘ
- FreeholdNo
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Generous plot362 m²
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space577 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)152 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential14,038 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.588 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
53 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 359 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 366 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 316 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 34% of schools
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
15th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 150 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 348 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 113 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
4th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 25 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 58% passed · CE avg 5.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 12 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.