Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Drs. P-kade 2
Semi-detached at Drs. P-kade 2 in Rotterdam (Nieuw Crooswijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 2025 and has 238 m² of living space, a 210 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Noord (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Noen (440 m).
Price & status history
- For sale7 Jul 2026
- Price reduced7 Jul 2026€ 1,449,500−€ 51,950
- Sold (conditional)3 Jun 2026€ 1,501,450
Property details
- Living area
- 238 m²
- Plot
- 210 m²
- Construction year
- 2025
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 1,465,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nieuw Crooswijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.5 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43.3%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental64%
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity79
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential arearesidential area
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot126 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space161 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical350 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential11,279 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,003 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 79 construction plans within 500 m · 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 368 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
45th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 364 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
84th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
69th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 128 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
33rd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.