Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23/07/2026 | Kerkweg 14 Pijnacker | € 400.000 € 379.000 | -5.3% | 103 m²182 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Mient 138 Den Haag | € 325.000 € 300.000 | -7.7% | 70 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Erasmusweg 1903 Den Haag | € 550.000 € 500.000 | -9.1% | 156 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Kaapstraat 80 Den Haag | € 285.000 € 275.000 | -3.5% | 82 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Buizerdlaan 213 Leidschendam | € 525.000 € 499.000 | -5.0% | 83 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Segbroeklaan 10 Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 109 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Tollenspark 15 's-Gravenzande | € 770.000 € 750.000 | -2.6% | 156 m²213 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Van Loostraat 116 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 725.000 | -6.5% | 138 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | San Franciscosingel 10 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 800.000 | -5.9% | 199 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Zeesluisweg 62 D Den Haag | € 560.000 € 524.500 | -6.3% | 75 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Aart van der Leeuwlaan 84 Delft | € 370.000 € 360.000 | -2.7% | 104 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Newtonplein 21 A Den Haag | € 239.500 € 219.500 | -8.3% | 29 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kievitstraat 11 Honselersdijk | € 445.000 € 422.500 | -5.1% | 88 m²134 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Boddaertstraat 28 Den Haag | € 399.000 € 375.000 | -6.0% | 98 m²87 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Loosduinsekade 571 Den Haag | € 315.000 € 300.000 | -4.8% | 88 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 7 f Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 265.000 | -3.6% | 52 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | De Genestetlaan 256 Den Haag | € 387.500 € 375.000 | -3.2% | 135 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hammarskjöldlaan 467 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 15.000 € 13.500 | -10.0% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Agrippinastraat 17 Voorburg | € 695.000 € 669.000 | -3.7% | 109 m²106 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | C.T. Storklaan 583 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 789.000 € 779.000 | -1.3% | 120 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Erasmusweg 1903
Semi-detached at Erasmusweg 1903 in 's-Gravenhage (Dreven en Gaarden neighbourhood). The home was built in 2007 and has 156 m² of living space, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (3.3 km). The nearest primary school is Erasmusschool (401 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer23 Jul 2026
- Price reduced23 Jul 2026€ 500,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 156 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 2007
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 490,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Dreven en Gaarden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High22.3%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated220 persons
- Liveability classⓘ
- Weakweak
- Liveability scoreⓘ
- clearly below average-0.2381 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1528 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- high share32%
- Net labour participationⓘ
- Low59%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- High21.6%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhoodⓘ
- Predominantly social rental67%
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away5.7 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place2.24 ratio
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)ⓘ
- Low (bottom quarter)6%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)69.2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)64.3%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance10%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 kmⓘ
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)132,639 m²
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Traffic on your own streetⓘ
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside44.4%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors41.3%
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.48 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Nearby14.4 km
- Within Wbb soil locationⓘ
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Noise loadⓘ
- Heavy62 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Disturbing52 dB
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Multiple industrial businesses5
- Greenhouse area within 1 kmⓘ
- Many greenhouses nearby13.27 ha
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)ⓘ
- Elevated2.1 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.4 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot845 m²
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space49 m²
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical750 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,048 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,036 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 32 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 97: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
31st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 238 pupils
Disadvantage score 87: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
8th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 316 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 72% of schools
3rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 365 pupils
Disadvantage score 101: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 72% of schools
75th percentile: high · DIA · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 644 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 3% of schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 104 pupils · total 807 pupils
Disadvantage score 112: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 67% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 462 pupils
Disadvantage score 149: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
24th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 330 pupils
Disadvantage score 78: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
78th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
49th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
27th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.