Price drops in and around Spijkenisse
More homes in and around Spijkenisse whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Falernogaard 1
Terraced house at Falernogaard 1 in Spijkenisse (Gaarden neighbourhood). The home was built in 1986 and has 61 m² of living space, a 203 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is De Akkers (821 m). The nearest primary school is De Wereldreiziger (299 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 365,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 390,000
Property details
- Living area
- 61 m²
- Plot
- 203 m²
- Construction year
- 1986
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 345,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Gaarden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable24%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated100 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1989 score
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High22.7%
- Overweight (neighbourhood)
- Much higher than average64.1%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away20.2 km
- Distance to train station
- Station very far away17.8 km
- Distance to train station
- Far away11.7 km
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)13%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.2%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)75.2%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-9.9 mm/yr
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)3.5 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.1%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.1%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.1%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Multiple industrial businesses3
- In military low-level flight area
- In military low-level flight areaYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.8 µg/kg
- Voltage level of nearest line
- Heavier line (150 kV)150 kV
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average45.5%
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot79 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average34%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space122 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)175 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential8,916 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,047 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.1%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 60: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
52nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 76: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
12th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 60: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
7th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
8th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 219 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 38% of schools
27th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 457 pupils
Disadvantage score 29: more disadvantage than 71% of schools
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 71 pupils · total 721 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 57 pupils · total 411 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
48th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 237 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 67% of schools
23rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 66: more disadvantage than 92% of schools
85th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
66th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
no exam results · PRO
96th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
37th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
36th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 162 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.