Price drops in and around Lent
More homes in and around Lent whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Floralaan 9
Terraced house at Floralaan 9 in Lent (Lent neighbourhood). The home was built in 1980 and has 178 m² of living space, a 236 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Nijmegen Lent (626 m). The nearest primary school is RK BS De Geldershof (520 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026€ 675,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale30 May 2026€ 685,000
Property details
- Living area
- 178 m²
- Plot
- 236 m²
- Construction year
- 1980
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 607,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lent, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to indoor swimming pool
- Far away5.6 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.3
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place7.08 ratio
- Distance to glasshouse horticulture area
- Greenhouses very nearby278 m
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby16
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot151 m above sea level
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.91 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticulture
- Nearby278 m
- Distance to nearest greenhouse
- Greenhouse nearby (<500 m), possible light or noise nuisance278 m
- Estimated sun hours (winter)
- Virtually no winter sun0 hour
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated2%
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Many greenhouses (possible light nuisance)13,218 m²
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources5
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Risk of light nuisance from glasshouses
- Greenhouse within 500 mYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average55.3%
- Distance to interchange station
- Quite far4.8 km
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot118 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels51%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space139 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)188 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical220 m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
48th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
86th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 323 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 91 pupils · total 556 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 8% of schools
90th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 443 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 89 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
28th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 332 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 212 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 315 pupils
Disadvantage score 53: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
61st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 32% of schools
48th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 190 exam candidates
83rd percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 105 exam candidates
81st percentile: high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 154 exam candidates
62nd percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 135 exam candidates
53rd percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 167 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
51st percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
85th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 117 exam candidates
8th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO · 101 exam candidates
77th percentile: high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 352 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.