Price drops in and around Nijmegen
More homes in and around Nijmegen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Marialaan 224
Apartment at Marialaan 224 in Nijmegen (Biezen neighbourhood). The home was built in 2004 and has 89 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Nijmegen (873 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Aquamarijn (362 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer17 Jul 2026
- Relisted9 Jul 2026€ 417,500−€ 7,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 425,000
Property details
- Living area
- 89 m²
- Construction year
- 2004
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 414,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Biezen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby19
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby18
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside36.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.6%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated180 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place3.96 ratio
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.3%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,100 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical530 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.609 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away17.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)10.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
60th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 315 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 32% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 8% of schools
55th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 80 pupils · total 623 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 449 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 174 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 442 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
81st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 154 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 135 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 54 exam candidates
69th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 113 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 245 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
48th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 190 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 105 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 122 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.