Price drops in and around Lelystad
More homes in and around Lelystad whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28/07/2026 | Gondel 14 11 Lelystad | β¬ 375.000 β¬ 350.000 | -6.7% | 136 mΒ²159 mΒ² | |||
28/07/2026 | Zeepkruidstraat 12 Lelystad | β¬ 849.000 β¬ 825.000 | -2.8% | 231 mΒ²432 mΒ² | |||
23/07/2026 | Schouw 37 31 Lelystad | β¬ 450.000 β¬ 425.000 | -5.6% | 116 mΒ²1270 mΒ² | |||
21/07/2026 | Trompenburgh 22 Lelystad | β¬ 675.000 β¬ 669.000 | -0.9% | 160 mΒ²626 mΒ² | |||
18/07/2026 | Horst 26 54 Lelystad | β¬ 475.000 β¬ 450.000 | -5.3% | 172 mΒ²228 mΒ² | |||
17/07/2026 | De Klencke 44 Lelystad | β¬ 485.000 β¬ 450.000 | -7.2% | 110 mΒ²274 mΒ² | |||
15/07/2026 | Botter 33 41 Lelystad | β¬ 399.000 β¬ 375.000 | -6.0% | 133 mΒ²201 mΒ² | |||
10/07/2026 | Reygersbeek 325 Lelystad | β¬ 515.000 β¬ 499.000 | -3.1% | 175 mΒ²107 mΒ² | |||
10/07/2026 | Langstraat 16 Lelystad | β¬ 550.000 β¬ 525.000 | -4.5% | 135 mΒ²299 mΒ² | |||
09/07/2026 | Galjoen 11 58 Lelystad | β¬ 745.000 β¬ 700.000 | -6.0% | 137 mΒ²377 mΒ² | |||
06/07/2026 | Parnassialaan 194 Lelystad | β¬ 750.000 β¬ 735.000 | -2.0% | 149 mΒ²353 mΒ² | |||
03/07/2026 | Schoener 16 19 Lelystad | β¬ 375.000 β¬ 350.000 | -6.7% | 104 mΒ²210 mΒ² | |||
03/07/2026 | RhΓ΄nestraat 218 Lelystad | β¬ 350.000 β¬ 345.000 | -1.4% | 93 mΒ²149 mΒ² | |||
03/07/2026 | Karveel 34 48 Lelystad | β¬ 395.000 β¬ 375.000 | -5.1% | 121 mΒ²200 mΒ² | 0 1 1 | ||
03/07/2026 | Langstraat 64 Lelystad | β¬ 495.000 β¬ 475.000 | -4.0% | 174 mΒ²301 mΒ² | |||
03/07/2026 | Trompenburgh 22 Lelystad | β¬ 725.000 β¬ 675.000 | -6.9% | 160 mΒ²626 mΒ² | |||
30/06/2026 | Reygersbeek 347 Lelystad | β¬ 435.000 β¬ 425.000 | -2.3% | 108 mΒ² | |||
26/06/2026 | Zilverparkkade 105 Lelystad | β¬ 400.000 β¬ 389.500 | -2.6% | 88 mΒ² | |||
26/06/2026 | Parkhaven 174 Lelystad | β¬ 450.000 β¬ 425.000 | -5.6% | 101 mΒ² | |||
25/06/2026 | Agoraweg 129 Lelystad | β¬ 395.000 β¬ 375.000 | -5.1% | 80 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Gondel 14 11
Terraced house at Gondel 14 11 in Lelystad (Gondel neighbourhood). The home was built in 1978 and has 134 mΒ² of living space, a 159 mΒ² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Lelystad Centrum (1 km). The nearest primary school is De Grundel (216 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted28 Jul 2026β¬ 350,000ββ¬ 25,000
- Listed for sale11 Jul 2026β¬ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 134 mΒ²
- Plot
- 159 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1978
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- β¬ 394,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- β
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Gondel, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyβ
- Low share renewable12%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)β
- High17.9%
- Distance to charging pointβ
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.2 km
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)β
- Low (bottom quarter)23%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress46 Β°C
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)β
- Significant ground subsidence-23.7 mm/yr
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)β
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.18 m
- Flood risk classβ
- High flood risklarge
- Distance to airportβ
- Nearby7.1 km
- Distance to wind farm in developmentβ
- Wind farm in development within 3 km (indicative location)1.4 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)β
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)β
- Elevated3.5%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Multiple industrial businesses4
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmβ
- Multiple sources5
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facilityβ
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectβ
- Noticeably warmer1.1 Β°C
- Wind farms in development within 3 kmβ
- Wind farm(s) in development in the region (indicative location)1
- Zoning purpose (main category)β
- Residential arearesidential area
- Shared plotβ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaβ
- Spacious plot88 mΒ²
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerβ
- Above average33%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsβ
- Ample roof space79 mΒ²
- Energy index (primary fossil)β
- Efficient (label A/B)135 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy labelβ
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roofβ
- Very high potential5,683 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpβ
- Excellent yield1,023 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits Β· 1 construction plan within 500 m Β· 4 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
23rd percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 21 pupils Β· total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
44th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 22 pupils Β· total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 46% of schools
36th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 43 pupils Β· total 387 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
28th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 23 pupils Β· total 135 pupils
Disadvantage score 64: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
6th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 23 pupils Β· total 251 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 64% of schools
30th percentile: average Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 12 pupils Β· total 129 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
52nd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 27 pupils Β· total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 21: more disadvantage than 60% of schools
2nd percentile: low Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 14 pupils Β· total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
40th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 31 pupils Β· total 282 pupils
Disadvantage score 20: more disadvantage than 60% of schools
31st percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 27 pupils Β· total 364 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
2nd percentile: low Β· 71% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO Β· 122 exam candidates
11th percentile: low Β· 80% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 259 exam candidates
42nd percentile: average Β· 95% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 195 exam candidates
4th percentile: low Β· 82% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 233 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.