Price drops in and around Zaandijk
More homes in and around Zaandijk whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18/07/2026 | Overtoom 17 Westzaan | € 470.000 € 419.500 | -10.7% | 112 m²89 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Koningsvarenstraat 65 Wormer | € 425.000 € 415.000 | -2.4% | 100 m²211 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Appartement type C 85 Assendelft | € 699.500 € 669.500 | -4.3% | 141 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Spinozahof 15 Krommenie | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 111 m²145 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Olof Palmeplein 55 Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 395.000 | -1.3% | 76 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Harpraam 45 Krommenie | € 625.000 € 599.000 | -4.2% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Narva-eiland 194 Amsterdam | € 1.170.000 € 1.100.000 | -6.0% | 134 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Spaansgroenstraat 46 Zaandam | € 290.000 € 280.000 | -3.5% | 79 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Zamenhofstraat 82 Amsterdam | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 48 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Reigerstraat 83 Zaandam | € 375.000 € 365.000 | -2.7% | 74 m²119 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Conradwerf 199 Zaandam | € 489.000 € 475.000 | -2.9% | 88 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Hammarbystraat 20 Amsterdam | € 830.000 € 750.000 | -9.6% | 107 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Hammarbystraat 36 Amsterdam | € 845.000 € 750.000 | -11.2% | 116 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Dorpsstraat 167 Assendelft | € 475.000 € 425.000 | -10.5% | 87 m²370 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Korenbloemstraat 14 Amsterdam | € 675.000 € 625.000 | -7.4% | 86 m²93 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | Vurehout 158 Zaandam | € 385.000 € 350.000 | -9.1% | 64 m²57 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Ooievaarslaan 5 Landsmeer | € 785.000 € 745.000 | -5.1% | 137 m²168 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Zeemansstraat 24 C Zaandam | € 300.000 € 289.000 | -3.7% | 55 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Castorplein 7 Amsterdam | € 495.000 € 475.000 | -4.0% | 58 m²123 m² | |||
13/07/2026 | Eilandspolder kavel 318 De Rijp | € 47.500 € 39.500 | -16.8% | — |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Harpstraat 49
Terraced house at Harpstraat 49 in Zaandijk (Rooswijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1973 and has 131 m² of living space, a 169 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Zaandijk Zaanse Schans (734 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool De Zoeker (357 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)15 Jul 2026
- Under offer8 Jul 2026
- Relisted3 Jul 2026€ 495,000−€ 5,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 500,000
Property details
- Living area
- 131 m²
- Plot
- 169 m²
- Construction year
- 1973
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 483,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Rooswijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable9%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.9%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High1.9%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby9
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot79 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space70 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)153 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,979 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,015 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 279 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
40th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 23% of schools
49th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 308 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 25% of schools
33rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 265 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile — high · DOE · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 392 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 177 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
33rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 183 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 11 pupils
52nd percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 308 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 85 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 15% of schools
63rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 158 exam candidates
65th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 218 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 71% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 128 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
20th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 134 exam candidates
32nd percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 316 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.