Price drops in and around Schiedam
More homes in and around Schiedam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hollandiahof 32
Apartment at Hollandiahof 32 in Schiedam (Hollandiabuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1999 and has 128 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Schiedam Centrum (360 m). The nearest primary school is Kaleidoscoop (577 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted21 Jul 2026€ 539,000−€ 36,000
- Listed for sale5 Jun 2026€ 575,000
Property details
- Living area
- 128 m²
- Construction year
- 1999
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 494,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hollandiabuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport4.6 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby21
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby10
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.9%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,808 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical450 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.423 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away25.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits · 49 construction plans within 500 m · 24 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
28th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 348 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
no recent test score · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 486 pupils
Disadvantage score 135 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
44th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 70 pupils · total 576 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
32nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
69th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 609 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
19th percentile — low · DOE · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 250 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
34th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 111 exam candidates
28th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
43rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 168 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
20th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VWO · 78 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.