Price drops in and around Spijkenisse
More homes in and around Spijkenisse whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22/07/2026 | Texasweg 8 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 106 m²125 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Hongerlandsedijk 698 Spijkenisse | € 499.900 € 475.000 | -5.0% | 118 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Willem Buytewechstraat 115 C Rotterdam | € 350.000 € 335.500 | -4.1% | 66 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Ruisvoornpad 51 Hoogvliet Rotterdam | € 574.500 € 549.500 | -4.3% | 158 m²154 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Laningpad 2 Spijkenisse | € 620.000 € 585.000 | -5.7% | 139 m²442 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Nieuwstraat 23 A Schiedam | € 395.000 € 374.000 | -5.3% | 97 m²40 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Rietdekker 25 Poortugaal | € 819.000 € 799.000 | -2.4% | 163 m²308 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Alphons Ariënsstraat 186 Schiedam | € 349.500 € 325.000 | -7.0% | 75 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Hollandiahof 32 Schiedam | € 575.000 € 539.000 | -6.3% | 128 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Houtlaan 93 Rotterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 132 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Ranonkelstraat 153 Spijkenisse | € 475.000 € 425.000 | -10.5% | 118 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Henegouwerlaan 25 A Rotterdam | € 395.000 € 375.000 | -5.1% | 115 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hongerlandsedijk 698
Apartment at Hongerlandsedijk 698 in Spijkenisse (De Dijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 2010 and has 118 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Spijkenisse Centrum (856 m). The nearest primary school is Piramide Elementen (720 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 475,000−€ 24,900
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 499,900
Property details
- Living area
- 118 m²
- Construction year
- 2010
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- € 483,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in De Dijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Very close (<500 m)489 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby28
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away18.3 km
- Distance to train stationⓘ
- Station very far away15.8 km
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated380 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- high share20.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot7,768 m²
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions17 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)74 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA++
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical0 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values10.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 19 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 90 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 393 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 373 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 446 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 55 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 21% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
34th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 107 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 162 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
36th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
37th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
96th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.