Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Houtmankade 61 3
Apartment at Houtmankade 61 in Amsterdam (Planciusbuurt-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1896 and has 101 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Centraal Station (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is De Zeeheld (257 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jun 2026€ 649,000−€ 46,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 695,000
Property details
- Living area
- 101 m²
- Construction year
- 1896
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 621,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Planciusbuurt-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.4%
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Strong rail nuisance5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby22
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)18,750 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.2%
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical620 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.63 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away6.4 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.2 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)3.1 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away3,560 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
33 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 316 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 34% of schools
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 390 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 2% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 113 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 0% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 359 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 366 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
38th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 88 exam candidates
43rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 25 exam candidates
36th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 27 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.